emailaddress said:
I'd say it doesn't really count as "full nude" unless the face is included with whatever's being shown. Otherwise it's just "nude" but with probable deniability. That seems to be the thing now.
Yeah seems it's a modern trend to try & be technical as possible. Sick of people trying to claim a full body pic isn't nude because you can't see a face. Either way we can confirm its her because she's covered in tats like most girls & it makes it 100% to identify who they are, it's also funny seeing girls deny that it's not them in pictures when they have the same tattoo in the picture lol.
